Quality before deadlines
We submit when the claims and evidence are ready and all authors have reviewed the paper. We aim for sound, completed work rather than perfection or a deadline at any cost.
Research culture
We want people to develop their own ideas and research programmes—and to do better work together than they could alone.
We share work in progress and make time for useful feedback. People have room to develop their own questions, with support from colleagues when they need it.
Seven values
These values guide how we conduct research and work together.
We pursue meaningful questions, use evidence and methods suited to them, interpret results honestly, and change course when the evidence calls for it. Venue is not a substitute for quality.
We ask for and provide useful critique, and we acknowledge contributions that shape the work. Requests may be accepted, declined, or renegotiated.
We make roles, expectations, commitments, authorship, and important decisions explicit, and revisit them when circumstances change.
We develop initiative and scientific judgement, take ownership of our work, seek advice when needed, and raise blockers early. Independence does not mean working alone.
We maintain sustainable momentum through learning, decisions, and completed research stages. Early exploration needs flexibility; later work needs bounded plans. Pace does not mean meeting every venue deadline.
We recognise publications and grants as well as the visible and invisible work that makes research and the group possible. Meaningful contributions should be made visible.
We can share unfinished ideas, failed attempts, and disagreement openly. We treat each other with respect and help sustain an inclusive research environment.
In practice
Our Handbook and Start Here guide turn these values into commitments about research and working together.
We submit when the claims and evidence are ready and all authors have reviewed the paper. We aim for sound, completed work rather than perfection or a deadline at any cost.
We agree roles and expectations, including when feedback is needed, and revisit them as the work changes.
We share unfinished work and raise blockers early. Colleagues can accept, decline or renegotiate feedback requests according to their expertise and workload. Disagreement should be candid and respectful.
We discuss authorship early and revisit it as contributions develop. We also recognise mentoring and the practical work that keeps research possible, such as debugging and maintaining shared resources.
We protect research time and work within agreed hours. Attendance or instant replies do not measure contribution; progress can also take the form of documented negative results and better methods.
Working together
Another member’s success creates opportunities for the group. We make space for independent ideas and respectful disagreement, and review these commitments as we learn what helps. Detailed procedures and independent routes for raising concerns are in the internal Handbook.
Opportunities
Check Aalborg University's official vacancy portal for advertised positions.
Students interested in a thesis or project collaboration may contact the faculty member whose research is the closest fit.
Find a potential supervisor